 |
Guests: 3, Members: 0 ...
most ever online: 71 (Members: 0, Guests: 71) on 21 Jun : 01:35
Members: 23 Newest member: Shahla |
 |
 |
- TI Az
[ 4 days, 14 hours, 20 mins, 4 secs ago ] - dwqdww21
[ 1 year, 2 months, 3 weeks, 5 days, 2 hours, 25 mins, 13 secs ago ] - Shahla
[ 1 year, 3 months, 3 weeks, 21 hours, 12 mins, 26 secs ago ] - Ali
[ 1 year, 6 months, 4 weeks, 20 hours, 34 mins, 32 secs ago ] - wantseo
[ 1 year, 7 months, 6 days, 1 hour, 50 mins, 34 secs ago ]
|
 |
|
 |
Welcome to Transparency International Azerbaijan |
 |
 |
 |
 |
This website is created with financial support of Eurasia Foundation, European Commission and BP Group Azerbaijan Business Unit. The views expressed in website represent TA’s opinion and not necessarily agree with official position of donors.
Transparency International is an international non-governmental organization, leading anti-corruption movement all over the globe. Berlin based Transparency International Secretariat coordinates anti-corruption activities in more than 90 countries of the world through its national chapters. The chapters are independent local NGOs free to choose their own polices and raise funds for their activities. Transparency International is based on the principle that as corruption is a country specific phenomenon, local organizations can be much more efficient that any efforts taken or imposed from the outside. Transparency Azerbaijan was established in October 2000 by representatives of civil society and academia and fully accredited as a national chapter in October 2001. We work mainly in the areas of public awareness raising, business ethics and research into reasons and forms of corruption in Azerbaijan and ways to reduce this destructive social phenomenon.
|
 |
 | MILLI MAJLIS AND CIVIL SOCIETY DISCUSS FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE LEGAL BASIS FOR COMBATING CORRUPTION IN AZERBAIJAN |  |  |  |
 |
 | Transparency Azerbaijan, with support from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), organized a roundtable to discuss Further development of the legal basis for combating corruption in Azerbaijan. The roundtable was the last in a series organized by Transparency Azerbaijan to facilitate dialogue between the state institutions and NGOs on increasing transparency and accountability. Representatives of the Apparatus of Milli Majlis (Parliament), Members of Parliament (MP) as well as local and international NGO representatives participated in the roundtable. Since 2000, the Azerbaijani Parliament have taken legal initiatives, such as changes to Criminal and Administrative Codes and Codes of Criminal and Administrative Procedures aimed at strengthening liability and expanding applicability of legal norms for corruption-related offenses, as well as adoption of a number of laws (including the Law on Criminal Liability of Legal Persons) and on-going law-making initiatives (including draft Code of Urban Building and Construction). Participants agreed that, despite Parliament’s efforts to create anti-corruption normative-legal basis, challenges remain, including absense of legal protection for whistle blowers. Despite adoption of the Law on Submission of Tax Returns for public officials, the law is not applied in practice due to a lack of supporting legal acts, namely a declaration form and receiving entity for MPs. Roundtable participants identified and discussed current deficiencies in efforts aimed at minimizing opportunities for corrupt practices in all sectors of public adminstration system and proposed legal initatives to increase transparency and accountability in this area. |
After introduction from Ali Huseynli, Chairman of Parliament’s Legal Policy and State Building Committee, Eldar Askerov, Senior Advisor of the Administrative and Military Law Department of Parliament’s Apparatus spoke on Parliament’s recent and planned legal initiatives. Alimamed Nuriyev, President of the Constitutional Research Fund and Coordinator of the Information and Cooperation Network of Anti-corruption NGOs, discussed further development of anti-corruption normative-legal basis in Azerbaijan. Rena Safaralieva, Executive Director, Transparency Azerbaijan, presented targeted recommendations on amendments to Azerbaijan legal framework based on eleven roundtables with respective public agencies. Participants praised the exchange of views between MPs and civil society that took place at the roundtable. They also decided to deliver to the Parliament written recommendations from civil society organizations on further improving the legal basis to combat corruption in Azerbaijan. |  |
 | GOVERNMENT AND CIVIL SOCIETY DISCUSS REFORMS AND PROBLEMS IN THE NOTARY PUBLIC SERVICE |  |  |  |
 |
 | Transparency Azerbaijan, with support from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), organized a roundtable to discuss Reforms and Problems in the Notary Public Service. The roundtable was one in a series organized by Transparency Azerbaijan to facilitate dialogue between the government institutions and NGOs on increasing transparency and accountability. Representatives of the Ministry of Justice, the State Anti-Corruption Commission, the Prosecutor General’s Anti-Corruption Department, as well as local and international NGO representatives participated in the roundtable. Participants agreed that despite Government of Azerbaijan efforts to ensure transparency and efficiency of the notary pubic offices by introduction of information tableaus and post-terminals, introduction of the institute of private notary public, adoption of Rules of Ethical Behavior for notary public, a number of challenges in this area remain. Roundtable participants identified and discussed current deficiencies in efforts to minimize opportunities for corrupt practices in the work of notary public, and proposed ways to increase transparency and accountability in this area. |
After introduction from Mehman Soltanov, head of department of Notary Public, Chief Department of Registration and Notary Public, Ministry of Justice, Vidadi Mayil, leading advisor of the same department, spoke of evelopment of the Notary Public System in Azerbaijan and introduction of private notary public system. Kanan Rahmanov, Baku private notary public, discussed the problems faced by private notary public in practice. Rena Safaraliyeva, Executive Director of Transparency Azerbaijan made general recommendations to develop the notary public system and prevent violations of the law in the practice of the notary public. Participants praised the exchange of views between government and civil society that took place at the roundtable. They also decided to deliver to the Ministry written recommendations from civil society organizations on improving transparency and accountability in the area of notary public service. |  |
 | CIVIL SOCIETY DISCUSS PROBLEMS IN REGISTRATION OF REAL ESTATE |  |  |  |
 |
 | Transparency Azerbaijan, with support from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), organized a roundtable to discuss Problems in Registration of Real Estate. The roundtable was one in a series organized by Transparency Azerbaijan aimed at facilitating dialogue between government institutions and NGOs on increasing transparency and accountability. Round table participants identified and discussed current deficiencies in efforts to minimize opportunities for corrupt practices in registration of real estate, and proposed ways to increase transparency and accountability in this area. It is regretful that the authorized public agency - State Registry of Real Estate under State Property Committee decided not to participate in the event despite advanced invitation. It shall be mentioned that, very much unlike previous nine round tables organized by Transparency Azerbaijan in the previous year, this is the first time when a public agency refrained from discussion with the civil society. Representatives of some public agencies, as well as local and international NGO representatives participated in the roundtable. |
Participants agreed that the Government of Azerbaijan is striving to ensure transparency and efficiency in the real estate registration system, including steps to simplify property registration in the country, to create a single information address register system and to apply on-line registration. By law, transfer of property in Azerbaijan requires four procedures which takes eleven days and 0.2% of the value of property, however, in practice a number of serious challenges in this area remain. Sahib Mammadov, chairman of Citizens Labor Rights Protection League spoke of existing problems in registration of real estate, Mirvari Gahramanli, head of Oil Industry Workers' Rights Protection Organization discussed typical legal violations in real estate registration and their prevention, Irada Javadova, chairperson of Public Association on Enlightenment on Human Rights touched upon the transparency of real estate registration from a practicing lawyer’s point of view. Zaur Ibrahimov, vice-president of the Constitutional Research Fund and coordinator of Information and Cooperation Network of Anti-corruption NGOs, spoke on methodology to monitor violations in real estate registration designed by local experts. At the end of the event, Rena Safaralieva, executive director, Transparency Azerbaijan summed up suggestions to increase transparency in registration of real estate. Participants expressed their disappointment that the chance exchange of views between government and civil society at the roundtable was lost. They also decided to deliver to the Registry written recommendations from civil society organizations on improving transparency and accountability in the area of real estate registration. |  |
 | ALAC workshop for TI Chapters |  |  |  |
 |
 | TI Az organized regional ALAC workshop for TI Chapters from Asia/Pacific region. Workshop gathered together colleagues from Pakistan, Sri-Lanka, India, Nepal, Maldives, and TI Secretariat to learn how to set up and run ALACs. Within the training colleagues from sister Chapters visited ALAC Guba to discuss practice and challenges of running regional ALACs. Last two days of the training were dedicated to database building and statistical data management and analysis. It is worth to mention that TI Kazakhstan and TI Guatemala, also trained in Azerbaijan in 2008, have successfully launched their ALACs and in 2009 became ALAC focal points for their respective regions (Central Asia and Latin America).
|
|  |
 | CORRUPTION PERCEPTION INDEX 2011 |  |  |  |
 |
 | The Transparency International national chapter in Azerbaijan presents the TI Corruption Perception Index 2011. This year Azerbaijan obtained a score of 2.4 which is the same as the last year (on a scale from 10 -very clean to 0 -very corrupt) and was ranked 143-d among 183 countries surveyed in 2011 (in 2010 the country was ranked 134-th out of 178). Transparency International emphasises that while the score reflects developments within a given country, the ranking establishes a connection between these trends and trends in the international context. In this perspective, the change of Azerbaijan’s position should be interpreted as a result of the increase of the number of countries in the Index and better achievements by other countries. Finally, since data for 2011 CPI were mostly gathered in 2009 and 2010 – the Index does not fully reflect progress realized in the course of the current year.Ranking enables TI to build an index, but a country's rank can change simply because new countries enter the index or others drop out, while a country’s score is a much more important indication of the perceived level of corruption in a country and allows to compare developments in a country over time. 2011 data for Azerbaijan was drawn from 7 different sources by 6 institutions. There was a change of sources from 2010. The gap between Armenia and Azerbaijan is not “big”. Armenia’s 2010 and 2011 score – 2.6 (dropped from 3.0 in 2007; 2.9 in 2008 and 2.7 in 2009) – is not terribly good either and is on a declining trend. Since Azerbaijan’s economic potential is immense, it invites more international scrutiny. That can be another reason why the international business community is apparently somewhat more critical about the situation in Azerbaijan than in other comparable countries. Russia showed considerable increase from 2.1 in 2010 to 2.4 in 2011. Other countries of interest to us are: as compared to 2010 in 2011 Turkey and Kazakhstan declined (from 4.4. to 4.2 and from 2.9 to 2.7); while Georgia increased from 3.8. to 4.1. and Iran from 2.2. to 2.7. For more detailed information please visit http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2011/. |
|  |
 | GOVERNMENT AND CIVIL SOCIETY DISCUSS VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW IN LABOR RELATIONS |  |  |  |
 |
 | Transparency Azerbaijan, with support from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), organized a roundtable to discuss Violations of Law in Labor Relations. The roundtable was one in a series organized by Transparency Azerbaijan to facilitate dialogue between the government institutions and NGOs on increasing transparency and accountability. Representatives of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection, the State Anti-Corruption Commission, the Prosecutor General’s Anti-Corruption Department, as well as local and international NGO representatives participated in the roundtable. Participants agreed that despite Government of Azerbaijan efforts to ensure labor safety, define relations, rights and responsibilities of employees and employers, punish perpetuators of labor law and bring the domestic legislation in line with international standards, a number of challenges in this area remain. Roundtable participants identified and discussed current deficiencies in efforts to minimize opportunities for corrupt practices in labor relations, and proposed ways to increase transparency and accountability in this area. Tahir Musayev, Head of the State Labour Inspection Service’s Supervisory Department for Social and Legal Issues told participants about efforts undertaken to protect employees’ labor rights in Azerbaijan. Sahib Mammadov, Chairman of the Citizens Labor Rights Protection League, discussed Azerbaijan’s experience with dispute resolution of individual labor disputes. Sevgim Rahmanov, Head of Traders and Producers’ Union, discussed how to reduce small entrepreneurs’ labor law violation. Rena Safaraliyeva, Executive Director of Transparency Azerbaijan made general recommendations to prevent violations of the law in labor relations. Participants praised the exchange of views between government and civil society that took place at the roundtable. They also decided to deliver to the Ministry written recommendations from civil society organizations on improving transparency and accountability in the area of labor relations. Participants also addressed the media at the end of the event. |
|  |
 | TRANSPARENCY AZERBAIJAN AND “AZERSU” DISCUSSED TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN WATER SUPPLY |  |  |  |
 |
 | Transparency Azerbaijan, with support from U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), organized a discussion of successes and challenges in water supply. The roundtable was one in a series organized by Transparency Azerbaijan to facilitate dialogue between the government institutions and NGOs on ways to increase transparency and accountability. Representatives of the Ministry of Industry and Energy, Baku City Housing and Utilities Department, Prosecutor’s Office, Anti-corruption Commission, NGOs and International Organizations. The relevant government entities had made some efforts to improve supply of water to the population and reduce corruption in this area of service. The new initiatives include the improvement of appeal mechanisms and their transparency, new contracts with consumers, installation of meters, and etc. The main goal of the roundtable was to identify and discuss current deficiencies in efforts to minimize corrupt practices in supply of water to the population, as well as to enhance safety standards in this sector, and also explore ways to increase transparency and accountability in this area. During the event Hanver Abasov, Head of Commercial Department of Azersu OJSV, spoke about recent reforms in supply of water to the population of Azerbaijan. Alimamed Nuriyev, President of the Constitution Research Fund and coordinator of Information and Cooperation Network of Anti-corruption NGOs, discussed existing problems in consumer-supplier relations in provision of water to the population. Alekper Agasiyev, an expert on the utilities sector from the Constitution Research Fund, talked about typical violations of the consumer’s rights by water suppliers. Rena Safaralieva, Executive Director of Transparency Azerbaijan made general recommendations on improving transparency in water supply. The participants praised the value in this exchange of views between government and civil society. They made some other recommendations and suggestions on the improving transparency and accountability in the area of water supply which will be submitted in writing to the respective agencies. Participants also addressed the media at the end of the event. |
|  |
 | Lack of budget transparency hinders Azerbaijan’s defence sector accountability |  |  |  |
 |
 | • Transparency Internationals Defence and Security Programme’s new report finds that many countries disclose only limited or no information on national defence and security spending to their citizens, hindering the ability of the public to hold their defence and security establishments to account for their spending decisions. • Azerbaijan scored Moderate to Low, indicating that the government provides too little information to the public and legislature to effectively hold the defence and security establishments accountable. ‘The Transparency of Defence Budgets’, a new report released by Transparency International’s Defence and Security Programme finds that most of the 93 countries studied disclose too little defence and security spending information to their public. The report also shows many countries severely restrict the information available even to their legislatures. Accessibility to defence budget documents (including budget proposals and audit reports) are important, as they are a key tool that the public and civil society can use to hold their governments to account. • Transparency Internationals Defence and Security Programme’s new report finds that many countries disclose only limited or no information on national defence and security spending to their citizens, hindering the ability of the public to hold their defence and security establishments to account for their spending decisions. • Azerbaijan scored Moderate to Low, indicating that the government provides too little information to the public and legislature to effectively hold the defence and security establishments accountable. ‘The Transparency of Defence Budgets’, a new report released by Transparency International’s Defence and Security Programme finds that most of the 93 countries studied disclose too little defence and security spending information to their public. The report also shows many countries severely restrict the information available even to their legislatures. Accessibility to defence budget documents (including budget proposals and audit reports) are important, as they are a key tool that the public and civil society can use to hold their governments to account. |
The report identifies the main aspects of defence budget transparency, including an overview of current practices and the risks that arise at each stage of the budgeting process. It also ranks 93 countries according to their defence budget transparency. The report’s general findings in the pie chart below show nearly 65% of countries studied score moderate or below.  | Azerbaijan scored Moderate to low, indicating that the government provides too little information to the public and legislature to effectively hold the defence and security establishments accountable for their spending decisions. According to the research of the Open Budget Index , Azerbaijan publishes all its budget documents, yet according to the OBI’s researcher, there is no information on the amount of spending on secret items. Few details of the defence budget are provided to the Azerbaijani parliament, and legislators are not provided with audit reports in order to oversee spending in these areas.
‘The defence and security sectors present a particular challenge regarding transparency and access to information. Confidentiality is central to certain aspects of their work, but national security is too often used as an excuse for highly aggregated budgets, over-classification, and even as a veil for corrupt activity,’ explains Mark Pyman, Director of Transparency International’s Defence and Security Programme. | ‘Protection of confidential information is compatible with accountability, if effective and robust systems of monitoring and control are in place and the legislature is allowed adequate oversight,’ he adds.
NOTES TO EDITORS: 1. The scoring system for this report was based on seven questions from the International Budget Partnership’s 2010 Open Budget Index questionnaires, which measure the amount of information a government provides to its public.
2. The ranking system methodology rates countries based on the availability of information, but it does not judge the accuracy of such information. The ranking also does not cover the existence of off-budget expenditure. Nevertheless, according to a 2009 study by Global Integrity, extra-budgetary spending from the State Oil Fund is problematic. These funds, which are not included in the budget, only need approval of the president, not the parliament. Global Integrity also reports that details of military expenditure do not require approval by the legislature.
3. Transparency International UK’s Defence and Security Programme helps to build integrity and reduce corruption in defence and security establishments worldwide through supporting counter corruption reform in nations, raising integrity in arms transfers, and influencing policy in defence and security: www.ti-defence.org Transparency International UK is part of the global movement against corruption: www.transparency.org.uk. |  |
|
 |
Posted by TI Az I would say that Ministry of Education is one of f[more ...] 19 Mar : 02:26
Posted by Elvin I`m much concerned of quality of work done by the [more ...] 19 Mar : 02:08
Posted by TI Az What do you think of hotline numbers of various pu[more ...] 02 Sep : 00:00
|
 |
 |
You must be logged in to post comments on this site - please either log in or if you are not registered click here to signup
TI Az27 Jan : 14:34A number of recommendations were prepared, discussed and presented to the Ministry of Education as a follow-up of the round table “Problems of the pre-school education and possible measures to be taken” organized by Transparency Azerbaijan and Ministry of Education with participation of Azerbaijan civil society representatives.
TI Az21 Oct : 13:22We are pleased to announce that the 2010 Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) will be launched on Tuesday, 26 October 2010.
TI Az08 Oct : 14:55Revenue Watch Institute (RWI) and Transparency International (TI) launched Revenue Watch Index on 6 October 2010
TI Az23 Apr : 16:38On 18 May 2010, Transparency Azerbaijan will be organizing the presentation of the project Monitoring Implementation of the European Neighborhood Policy Action Plan for Azerbaijan
TI Az15 Nov : 15:48Presentation of the Corruption Perception Index 2009 developed by Transparency International will be held on 17 November 2009.
Proxy04 Sep : 14:59Welcome everyone!
|
 |
 |
| When men are pure, laws are useless; when men are corrupt, laws are broken. |
| Benjamin Disraeli |
|
 |
|